• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Zilo.Me

We Already Live In The Future

  • Blog
  • About
  • Ask Chris
He’s keeping and bearing his arms – “It’s a matter of interpretation.”

He’s keeping and bearing his arms – “It’s a matter of interpretation.”

December 16, 2012 By Chris Zilo

The recent massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary must serve as a turning point in this countries relationship with guns. It’s time for stricter gun control.

Arnold_Schwarzenegger_0

The NRA has systematically fought for the WRONG interpretation of the 2nd Amendment in the interest of the Gun Manufacturing Industry, not the people, not the state, not its members: IT IS TIME FOR CHANGE, IT IS TIME FOR STRICTER GUN CONTROL LAWS.

I’m not calling for a ban on all guns, I’m calling for common sense. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

From Cornell Law:

Such language has created considerable debate regarding the Amendment’s intended scope. On the one hand, some believe that the Amendment’s phrase “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” creates an individual constitutional right for citizens of the United States. Under this “individual right theory,” the United States Constitution restricts legislative bodies from prohibiting firearm possession, or at the very least, the Amendment renders prohibitory and restrictive regulation presumptively unconstitutional. On the other hand, some scholars point to the prefatory language “a well regulated Militia” to argue that the Framers intended only to restrict Congress from legislating away a state’s right to self-defense. Scholars have come to call this theory “the collective rights theory.” A collective rights theory of the Second Amendment asserts that citizens do not have an individual right to possess guns and that local, state, and federal legislative bodies therefore possess the authority to regulate firearms without implicating a constitutional right.

It’s time for re-interpretation, if not now, when?

 

Filed Under: Thoughts Tagged With: common sense, gun control laws, second amendment, united states constitution

Primary Sidebar

Search

Categories

  • Community
  • Creativity
  • Film & TV
  • Inspiration
  • Media
  • Social Media
  • Startups
  • Technology
  • Thoughts
Chris Zilo

Tags

advertising analysis Apple apps blogging books business creativity data design documentary facebook Film food Google gun control laws ideas Innovation instagram lifelogging marketing media metrics Mobile Netflix notes privacy products reading social social media Startups strategy technology Thoughts tips tools Tracking Trends TV twitter united states constitution video Watch wearable tech

Footer CTA

Follow Me

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Email Newsletter

Like what I have to say? Make it easy for yourself, signup to receive all my posts (and more) via email.

Copyright © 2025 · Terms of Service · Privacy Policy · Affiliate Disclosure